Alok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3386 of 2016 ====================================================== Alok Kumar Son of Sri Raghunath Mahto, resident of village + P.O.- Harpur, Pusa, P.S.- Pusa, District- Samastipur ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The Director, Education Project, Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna
4. The District Magistrate, Samastipur
5. The District Education Officer, Samastipur
6. The District Programme Officer, Samastipur
7. The Block Education Officer, Pusa Block, Samastipur
8. The Principal Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Harpur Pusa, Samastipur
9. The Co-ordinator, Sankul Sansadhan, Centre Birauli, Pusa Samastipur
10. The Chairman, School Education Committee, Rajkiya Madhya School, Harpur Pusa, Pusa, Samastipur
11. Amarjeet Kumar Baitha S/o- Late Siya Sharan Baitha, resident of village and P.O.- Harpur, Pusa, P.S.- Pusa, District- Samastipur ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Satya Prakash, AC to SC XXII For respondent BEPC : Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 19-03-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that substantive grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. In view of the aforesaid, the writ application is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to agitate before the appropriate forum with regard to the subsisting grievance of the petitioner by filing detail representation.
In case such representation is filed along with a copy of this order, the respondents authorities are required to
Patna High Court CWJC No.3386 of 2016(2) dt.19-03-2018 2/2 address the subsisting grievance of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of sixty days, from the date of receipt/production of this order. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ application stands disposed off.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Shamshad/- U