← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2110/2022allowed

Kapil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-25Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2110 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4302 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Kapil Paswan son of Chalitra Paswan resident of village- Mor, (part in Mokamah), P.S. Mokamah, District- Patna.

2.

Pinku Paswan son of Sumer Paswan resident of village- Mor, (part in Mokamah), P.S. Mokamah, District- Patna.

3.

Shriram Paswan son of Sukhdev Paswan resident of village- Mor Barghara, (part in Mokamah), P.S. Mokamah, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Secretariate, Patna. 2.

Collector of the District, Patna.

3.

Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Barh, Patna.

4.

Block Development Officer, Mokamah, Patna.

5.

Circle Officer, Mokamah, Patna.

6.

Panchayat Secretary, Mor Panchayat, Mokamah, Patna. 7.

Mukhiya, Mor Panchayat, Mokamah, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag 12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 25-04-2025 The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing CWJC No.4302 of 2020, which has stood dismissed on account of non-prosecution by an order dated 27.09.2022.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since due to inadvertence, the case could not be marked in the daily cause-list, the counsel for the petitioner could not appear

Patna High Court MJC No.2110 of 2022(3) dt.25-04-2025 2/2 in the Court when the case was called out for hearing, hence, the aforesaid petition was dismissed on account of nonprosecution, thus a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file. 3.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and proper to restore the aforesaid writ petition bearing CWJC No. 4302 of 2020 to its original file. 4.

The present restoration petition stands allowed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U