Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62201 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1429 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Kumar Sah S/O Late Rabindra Prasad Sah R/O Village- Nauagarhi, P.S- Munger, Distt.- Munger, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ranjan Kumar S/O Tribhuban Prasad Singh R/O Mohalla- Katghar, P.SBabarganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Kant For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 319(2), 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. It is alleged that this petitioner, on the basis of a sale-deed for Plot No. 1455-Ka, intentionally secured mutation of plot no. 1455-Kha. Though, petitioner claimed to have applied for correct plot number before the revenue authorities, but no such document has been produced by him despite several opportunities and thus, petitioner tried to grab the land of complainant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62201 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence and due to an inadvertent clerical error, different plot number was recorded and consequently, the petitioner approached before the competent authority by filing Title Suit No. 634 of 2016 for correction of the said plot number. Moreover, the dispute is purely of civil nature, for which, title suit is already pending before the competent court. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 1429 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T