Preeti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20999 of 2021 ====================================================== Preeti Kumari Wife of rahul Raj, Resident of Village-Jhitkahiyan, P.O. and P.S.-Minapur, District-Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director Integrated Child Development Service, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

5.

The District Programme Officer, (I.C.D.S.) Muzaffarpur. 6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Minapur, Muzaffarpur. 7.

Babita Kumari Wife of Pankaj Kumar Singh Resident of VillageJhitkahiyan, P.O. and P.S.-Minapur, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. Raisul Haque ( Sc10 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. (i)To issue an appropriate order/s, direction/s including preferably in the nature a writ of CERTIORARI for quashing the order dated 26.10.2021 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur (hereinafter referred to as respondent No.3) in I.C.D.S.

Appeal Case No.56/2021 whereby and whereunder he has allowed the

Patna High Court CWJC No.20999 of 2021(2) dt.03-04-2024 2/2 said Appeal in favour of the private respondent and set aside the order dated 26.06.2021 passed by the District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur.

(ii) To direct the respondents maintain status-quo as existing till the final outcome of the writ petition."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U