Patna High CourtCWJC/327/2015disposed

Meena Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-23Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.327 of 2015 ====================================================== Meena Kumari daughter of Shri Janardan Singh, wife of Shri Jai Prakash Prasad Rai resident of village - Radhiya, P.O. Pipara, Police Station - Maharajganj, District - Siwan .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Siwan

4. The District Education Officer, Siwan

5. The District Programme Officer ( Establishment ), Siwan

6. The Block Development officer, Maharajganj Block, District - Siwan

7. The Block Education Officer, Maharajganj, District - Siwan

8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Balaun, Block Maharajganj, District - Siwan

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Balaun, Block Maharajganj, District - Siwan

10. The Presiding officer, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Siwan

11. Suganti Devi wife of Shri Ram Naresh Yadav resident of village - Balaun, Police Station - Maharajganj, District - Siwan, at present Panchayat Teacher, newly Created Primary School Barhiya Tola, Anchal Maharajganj, District - Siwan .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to SC-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-01-2017 Sri Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned AC to SC-4, submits that the present writ petition was filed against the order of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority. However, after filing of the writ petition, the State Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal has started functioning.

Patna High Court CWJC No.327 of 2015 (2) dt.23-01-2017 2/2 Accordingly, there is no reason to keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority. It goes without saying that the period consumed in pursuing the present writ petition i.e. from 06.01.2015 till date shall be excluded, while considering the limitation matter. If such petition is filed, the learned Tribunal may examine the case on its own merit.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U