Juli Kumari @ Juli Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15400 of 2022 ====================================================== Juli Kumari @ Juli Devi Wife of Ritesh Kumar, Resident of Village and PostBurhawal, Ward No. 7, Block- Karakat, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, Social and Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Indira Bhawan, West Boring Canal Road, Patna.

4.

The Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate cum Collector, Rohtas, Sasaram. 6.

The District Programme Officer, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Rohtas, Sasaram.

7.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas.

8.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dehri, Rohtas.

9.

The Block Development Officer, Karahat, Rohtas. 10.

The Child Development Project Officer, Karakat, Division- Dehri, DistrictRohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sujit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prashant Pratap (Gp2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For Issuance of Writ / Writs, Order / Orders, Direction / Directions in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to immediately appoint the petitioner for the post of Anganwadi Sevika, under Gram Panchayat Budhwal, Ward No. 7, Block - Karakat, District - Rohtas (ii) For further prayer of the petitioner to impose the

Patna High Court CWJC No.15400 of 2022(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 punishment to the concern respondent who have illegally appointed the wrong candidate knowingly to against the petitioner on the basis of wrong sets of facts by illegal process using back office method."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U