Main Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32883 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2017 Thana -RAXAUL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Main Ram Son of Jeetlal Ram, Resident of Village- Anandi Ganj Bazaar, P.S.- Palanwa, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Union of India through Inspector General, S.S.B., Frontier Head Quarter, Patna.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-07-2017 This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 36 of 2017 registered for the offence(s) under section(s) 25 (1-b)A, 26 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one loaded Katta from his possession.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he, having no criminal antecedent, is in custody since 22.2.2017. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32883 of 2017 (2) dt.14-07-2017 2/2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 36 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine rhyme or reasons, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iv) If the petitioner's active participation is found in any similar type of cases, in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Mahesh/- U T