← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3819/2018disposed

Arvind Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Department Of Human Resources, N

2023-07-19Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3819 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15271 of 2014 ====================================================== 1.

Arvind Kumar, Son of Sri Panna Lal Roy, Resident of Mohalla - Surya Bihar Colony, Behind Poddar Tiles Factor, Bailey Road, Danapur, P.S. - Rapaspur, District - Patna.

2.

Braj Kishore Prasad, Son of Sri Ram Rup Narayan, Resident of Mohalla - Chak Musallahpur, P.S. - Kadamkuan, District - Patna. 3.

Govind Kumar Ray, Son of Mahadeo Prasad Ray, Resident of Village - Horilganj, P.S. and District- Jehanabad.

4.

Tulsi Das Mahto, Son of Late Baij Nath Mahto, Resident of Mohalla - Hardagh, Police Station - Silli, District- Ranchi. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 2.

R.K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

3.

Rajiv Prasad Singh Ranjan, The Director, Secondary Education, Budh Marg, Patna - 1.

4.

Sanjeev Suman, The Staff Selection Commission, through its Secretary, Vishwashabraiya Bhawan, Patna, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the B.S.S.C. : Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, A.C. to G.A. XII.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. In pursuance of the order dated 01.11.2017, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15271 of 2014, the opposite parties have already passed an order vide Gyapank:-2/Ni Ko-28/2013-786 dated 21.04.2022.

Patna High Court MJC No.3819 of 2018(6) dt.19-07-2023 2/2

3. Considering the fact that in pursuance of the order dated 01.11.2017, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15271 of 2014, the order has already been passed, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt application.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners shall be at liberty to challenge the order dated 21.04.2022, if so advised.

5. With the aforesaid liberty, the present contempt application stands disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T