← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72167/2021bail granted

Mira Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-20Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72167 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2021 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

MIRA DEVI W/o Sudhir Pandey Resident of Village- Raghunathpur, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan.

2.

Ravi Kumar Pandey Son of Sudhir Pandey Resident of VillageRaghunathpur, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh For the Informant Mr. S.K. Dwivedi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-07-2022 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application against petitioner no. 1.

Permission is accorded.

This application is dismissed as withdrawn against petitioner no. 1.

So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, the instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner no. 2 apprehending his arrest in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case no. 154 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on section 307 of the IPC.

Prosecution case relates to assault to the son of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72167 of 2021(3) dt.20-07-2022 2/2 informant in his stomach by knife by accused Mira Devi. Petitioner no. 2 assaulted him by fists and slaps.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Specific allegation is against Mira Devi and not against the petitioner no. 2. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against him. The alleged occurrence took place at the spur of moment. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 2 on bail. The petitioner no. 2 is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case no. 154 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-VIII, Siwan subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U