Rajesh Ranjan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3559 of 2014 ===========================================================
1. Rajesh Ranjan son of Naresh Prasad, Resident of D And C Colony 'B' Type Flat No. 16, B.C.C.L. Jeal Gora, P.S. Jora Pokhar, Distt. Dhanbad (Jharkhand)
2. Vikash Kumar Singh son of Ram Nagina Singh, Resident of Opposite Police Chowky No. 3 Hare Krishna Colony, P.S. Sasaram (Model), Distt. Sasaram (Rohtas)
3. Shailendra Kumar son of Shri Rajendra Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Parsa Bajar, P.S.- Parsa Bajar, District- Patna
4. Ganesh Kumar son of Sri Ramdeo Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Kaseri Toli, Ward No. 17, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna
3. Bihar Staff Selection Commission through Secretary
4. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14 .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. RANJAN KUMAR SINGH For the Respondent State: Mr. AVNISH NANDAN SINHA, GP 11 For the B P S C : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-01-2016 The issues being raised by the present petitioners are not required to be re-adjudicated and valuable judicial time is not required to be wasted on issues and questions which are already answered even by a Division Bench of this Court, arising out of identical set of facts. The relevant decision is reported in 2015 (2) PLJR 464, which was the case of Suresh Yadav and others vs. State of Bihar and others.
The reasoning and rationale for rejecting the appeal
Patna High Court CWJC No.3559 of 2014 dt.04-01-2016 preferred against the decision of a learned single Judge also applies to the present set of facts and the same reasoning shall also apply for rejection of the present writ application.
Writ application is dismissed (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U