← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43832/2017bail granted

Ritesh Kumar @ Ritesh Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43832 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43832 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -395 Year- 2017 Thana -MOHANIA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Ritesh Kumar @ Ritesh Sinha Son of Shri Bhagwan Choudhary, R/o Village- Thorsan, P.S.- Kargahar, District- Rohtas (Sasaram), Bihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinay Raj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 395 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 273, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) and 38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 287 litres of IMFL. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 19.07.2017 and other co-accused of this case has already been granted privilege of bail by this Court vide order dated 15.09.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44008 of 2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43832 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also other co-accused has been granted bail by this Court, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise - Cum- A.D.J - VI, Kaimur at Bhabhua, in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 395 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T