Bhushan Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66016 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2024 Thana- TISIAUTA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

BHUSHAN RAY S/O SONELAL DAS R/o Pindauta Khurd, Tisiauta, P.S. - Tisiauta, Distt. - Vaishali 2.

Ram Das Ray S/o Sonelal Das R/o Pindauta Khurd, Tisiauta, P.S. - Tisiauta, Distt. - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-10-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 5-6-2024 at 8 pm, Matuk Rai was piling pillar on his land, on protest, Matuk abused and called Vipin and ordered to kill the informant, on which Vipin assaulted him by farsa causing injury on head, and when his family members came to save him, accused Jagarnath along with other named accused persons and ten unknown accused came variously armed and assaulted Mithilesh, Anil and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66016 of 2024(2) dt.23-10-2024 2/2 Sanjaniya Devi causing injury on head and Matuk also assaulted Sanjaniya by lathi causing fracture of her hand and also snatched her chain.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to land. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without submitting, then the allegation of assault is not specific and petitioners are not criminals.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 59 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T