Shyam Sundar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60805 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2022 Thana- PURUSHOTTAMPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Shyam Sundar Mahto S/O Umakant Mahto Resident of village- Tihuki, P.S.- Pokhariya, District- Persa Nepal.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 62679 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2022 Thana- PURUSHOTTAMPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ajay Patel Son of Sri Lotan Patel @ Lutan Patel R/V- Dhankutwa, P.SBalthar, Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 60805 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vishal Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 62679 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in connection with Purushottampur P.S. Case No. 66 of 2022, G.R. No. 1628 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under
2/4 Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. As per allegation, 100 litres of Nepali country made liquor has been recovered from a motorcycle.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. They further submit that nothing has recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. They also submit that the alleged motorcycle does not belong to the petitioners.
It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the petition that the petitioners have never moved before this Court for grant of anticipatory bail or regular bail.
It has further been stated that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
However, the learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioners for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners, above-named, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.
3/4 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ld. Exclusive Special Judge, Excise, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Purushottampur P.S. Case No. 66 of 2022, G.R. No. 1628 of 2022 on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioners will make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required.
(ii) The petitioners will undertake that investigation/trial will not hamper on account of their absence or non-cooperation. They must be available to the police or the court whenever their presence is required. (iii) The petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.
(iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents, the learned court below shall cancel the bail bond of the
4/4 petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same.
(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, the learned court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.
The application stands allowed accordingly.
The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.
(Jitendra Kumar, J) ashishkr/- U T