Prity Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60137 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2022 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

PRITY KUMARI W/o Navin Singh R/o Village- Chainpura, P.S.- Warisaliganj, Distt- Nawada.

2.

SHIVANI KUMARI W/o Ganit Singh R/o Village- Chainpura, P.S.- Warisaliganj, Distt- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 332, 333, 353, 427 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that the accused persons including the petitioners created obstruction in discharge of official duty when informant along with police force had gone to arrest Navin Singh, when the accused persons pelted stones from the rooftop on account of which hand guard and magazine of constable Ravi Shankar got damaged and Navin Singh fled away. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60137 of 2022(2) dt.22-11-2022 2/2 implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the allegation of pelting stone is general and omnibus in nature. Learned counsel next submits that it absolutely does not stand to reason that when the police force was present at the house of Navin Singh and these petitioners are alleged to have created obstruction in discharge of official duties while other apprehended from the place of occurrence itself.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 332 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T