Sanjeev Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59874 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-487 Year-2022 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.
Sanjeev Singh S/O Santosh Singh Resident of village- Barnaw, P.S.- Aayar, District- Bhojpur.
2.
Navneet Kumar S/o Shyam Narayan Singh Resident of Village- Jagdishpur Ward No- 10, Kurmi Tola, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur (Arrah). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey (App.84) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-01-2023 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioners and Ld. APP for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 487 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a)/ 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
As per allegation, 118.50 liters of liquor has been recovered from the car of the petitioner.
Ld. counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been
2/4 recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. He also submits that the petitioners were unaware of the material kept in the dicky of the car.
He further submits that the petitioners have been languishing in jail since 04.09.2022.
It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one. However, Ld. APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioners for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioners, abovenamed, to be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. Special Judge, Excise No.1-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge-IV, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with
3/4 Mohania P.S. Case No. 487 of 2022 on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioners will make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required.
(ii) The petitioners will undertake that investigation/trial will not hamper on account of their absence or non-cooperation. They must be available to the police or the court whenever their presence is required. (iii) The petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.
(iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same.
4/4 (v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.
Ld. counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.
(Jitendra Kumar, J) chandan/- U T