Brajesh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56765 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2018 Thana- KHODAWANDPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Brajesh Sahni, Son of Suresh Sahni, Resident of Village - Sujjanpur, P.S.- Gadhpura, Dist.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arjun Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs.Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for State.
The petitioner in this case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Khondawanpur P.S. Case No.220/2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and save and except suspicion there is nothing against the petitioner.
Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56765 of 2019(3) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 wherein the charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner for the offence alleged under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and it has come in paragraph 46 of the case diary that the petitioner has got criminal history and this Court finds from the statements made in paragraph 3 of the present application that there are at least three cases pending against him, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This application is dismissed. In case the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, his prayer for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T