← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66402/2023dismissed

Kanhaiya Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Economic Offence Unit, Patna

2023-10-06Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66402 of 2023 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30591 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2014 Thana- ECONOMIC OFFENCES, BIHAR District- Patna ====================================================== KANHAIYA KUMAR S/o LATE RAJGIR RAJAK R/o Purnea Court Station, P.S. - Khajanchi Haat, Distt. - Purnea, Presently residing at Flat no. 301, Saakar Indu Villa Apartment, Rajbanshi Nagar, Road No. 02 Extension, P.S. - Shastri Nagar, Distt. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar through the Economic Offence Unit, Patna Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Kumar Verma, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Prakash Kumar, Adv.

Mr.Manoranjan Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vishwanath Pd. Sinha, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Vijay Anand, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-10-2023 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior counsel for the EOU.

2.

This application is filed for modification of the order dated 08.08.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.30591 of 2023, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn.

3.

It is submitted by learned Senior counsel for the petitioner that due to inadvertence and communication gap, learned counsel for the petitioner conveyed to Hon'ble Court that petitioner is willing to withdraw the bail application and as such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66402 of 2023(2) dt.06-10-2023 2/2 Hon'ble Court was pleased to dismiss the case as withdrawn, however, the petitioner never intended to withdraw the case. 4.

Having gone through the order dated 08.08.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.30591 of 2023, it is clear that on the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner himself, the case was dismissed as withdrawn. As such, there is no ground and I am not inclined to entertain this modification application. 5.

It is accordingly, dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T