Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59881/2025bail granted

Vilash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-02Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59881 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2025 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Vilash Yadav son of Jagdish Yadav Resident Of Village -Poly Technic Chowk, Kalasan, Ward No 09, Ps- Chausa District -Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pooja Prasad, Adv.

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025 dated 27.05.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 80 of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner, who is the father-in-law of the deceased. It is further submitted that the husband of the deceased is in jail/custody as stated in para-13 of the bail petition. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59881 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 tortured the deceased. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody in this case since 27.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner and submitted that the several witnesses, examined in para-4, 5, 22, 23 and 24, have supported the prosecution case. As per the postmortem report, which is mentioned in the impugned order dated 21.07.2025, the cause of death is Cardio Pulmonary arrest due to Asphyxia caused by hanging.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Udakishunganj in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T