← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4093/2016allowed

Shyam Sundar Thakur v. Ram Charitar Thakur And ORS

2022-11-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4093 of 2016 In CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.356 of 2016 ====================================================== Shyam Sundar Thakur son of Late Jai Narayan Thakur, resident of Village Hanuman Nagar, P.S. Singhwara, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Ram Charitar Thakur and Ors son of Late Kishun Thakur 2.

Jai Mangal Thakur 3.

Satrughan Thakur Both sons of Ramcharitar Thakur All resident of VillageHanuman Nagar, P.S. Singhwara, District- Darbhanga. 4.

Shri Brahm Deo Thakur 5.

Ram Ashish Thakur Both sons of Late Raghunath Thakur 6.

Madan Thakur 7.

Murli Thakur Both sons of Brahm Deo Thakur 8.

Santosh Thakur son of Ram Ashish Thakur 9.

Arbind Kumar Thakur 10.

Amar Nath Thakur 11.

Manish Thakur All sons of Shyam Sunder Thakur 12.

RajnishThakur son of Madan Thakur 13.

Rupesh Thakur, son of Murli Thakur All resident of Village Hanuman Nagar, P.S. Singhwara, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Bali Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-11-2022 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Misc. 356 of 2016, which was dismissed on 19.08.2016. For the reasons mentioned in this application, it is allowed and Civil Misc. 356 of 2016 is restored to its original file.

Patna High Court MJC No.4093 of 2016(3) dt.11-11-2022 2/2 Civil Misc. 356 of 2016 It seems that the petitioners were trying to delay the disposal of the Pattibandi Case no. 01 of 2013 and therefore, the application dated 27.04.2016 was dismissed.

There is no jurisdictional error in the impugned order dated 27.04.2016.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

The Court below will proceed with the matter if the same is kept pending on account of pendency of this revision application in this Court.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/ U