Md. Mansoor v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70700 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2024 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Md. Mansoor Son of Abdul Sattar Resident of village -Bishanpur Touli Kola, PS- Dagaruwa, District- Purnea 2.

Md Manjur Alam @ Manjur Alam Son of Abdul Sattar Resident of village -Bishanpur Touli Kola, PS- Dagaruwa, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nadimul Hasan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 has been arrested by the police, therefore, he does not want to press this application with regard to petitioner no. 1.

2. Accordingly, this application with regard to petitioner no. 1 is dismissed as not pressed.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

4. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

5. Petitioner along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant's side.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70700 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/2

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

7. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner no. 2 in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dagarua P.S. Case No. 169 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T