Javed Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62480 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80060 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Banka ====================================================== Javed Ansari S/o Md. Saheed Ansari Resident Of vill- Jaipur- Ramandih, PSDhorayia, Distt.- Banka, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Naujahat Praveen C/o Javed Ansari R/o ward no. 11, vill- Jaipur-Ramandih, P.S.- Dhorayia, Distt.- Banka ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that earlier the bail petition of this petitioner was rejected vide order dated 29.01.2025 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months if so advised.

3. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 65(2) & 351(3) of the BNS and under Sections 4 & 6 of the POCSO Act.

4. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner who is the father of four daughters had committed rape with his two daughters.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62480 of 2025(5) dt.21-11-2025 2/2 that during trial three witnesses have been examined and that the witnesses have not supported the case of the prosecution but from perusal of the deposition of the witnesses who have been examined, mainly the victim, she has supported the entire version.

6. It is a case where father has committed rape with his own daughters. A report has been called from the learned trial court which goes to show that out of 7 witnesses three witnesses have been examined and rest four prosecution witnesses are still to be examined.

7. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail to the petitioner.

8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial within three months having regard to the provisions of POCSO Act. The petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within the said period.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T