Ganesh Yadav @ Ganesh Gope v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70148 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2024 Thana- MARANCHI District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Ganesh Yadav @ Ganesh Gope Son of Late Tanik Yadav Resident of Village- Rampur Dumra, PS- Pachmahla (Maranchi), District- Patna 2.

Malti Devi Wife of Ganesh Yadav @ Ganesh Gope Resident of VillageRampur Dumra, PS- Pachmahla (Maranchi), District- Patna 3.

Teni Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav @ Ganesh Gope Resident of VillageRampur Dumra, PS- Pachmahla (Maranchi), District- Patna 4.

Kavita Devi @ Kavita Kumari Wife of Durgesh Yadav Resident of VillageRampur Dumra, PS- Pachmahla (Maranchi), District- Patna 5.

Gunjan Kumari D/O- Ganesh Yadav @ Ganesh Gope Resident of VillageRampur Dumra, PS- Pachmahla (Maranchi), District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant side.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70148 of 2024(2) dt.21-10-2024 2/2 the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Marachi P.S. Case No. 79 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T