Patna High CourtMJC/1026/2014disposed

Praveen Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-23Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1026 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7553 of 2013 =========================================================== Praveen Singh, Son of Sri Ram Das Singh, Resident of 38, Patal Babu Road, Mundichak, Police Station- Tilka Manjhi (Kotwali) District- Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Mr. Amir Subhani, The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. Mr. Minhaz Alam, The Commissioner, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur

4. Mr. B. Kartike, The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur

5. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, The Senior Superintendent Of Police, Bhagalpur

6. Mr. Anil Singh, The District Arms Magistrate, Bhagalpur

7. Smt. Veena Kumari, The Dy. S.P. Town, Bhagalpur

8. Mr. Kanhaiya Lal, The Police Inspector, Kotwali, Bhagalpur

9. Mr. Baidnath Kumar, The Officer In-charge, Tilka Manjhi Police Station, Bhagalpur .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Md. Najimul Hodda. For the Respondent/s : A.C. to S.C. 26. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-02-2015 The present contempt application is filed for noncompliance of the order dated 04.07.2013 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 7553 of 2013 whereunder the writ petition of the petitioner was allowed quashing the order dated 11.06.2010 by the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur remitting back the matter to the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur for re-consideration in the light of the order and for passing fresh orders in accordance with law, preferably within

Patna High Court MJC No.1026 of 2014 dt.23-02-2015 2/2 two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

Learned A.C. to S.C. 26, appearing on behalf of the opposite parties, submits that in compliance of the order vide C.W.J.C. No. 7553 of 2013 dated 04.07.2013, opposite party no.4 has passed the detailed order giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and rejected his application for issuing the license of arms for pistol.

Since the order under contempt has been complied by opposite party no.4, no further action is required to be taken. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of. However, if petitioner feels aggrieved, he may take recourse in accordance with law.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) Shail/- U