Pappu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71704 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2021 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== PAPPU PASWAN Son of Shankar Paswan Resident of Village- Ganauli, P.S.- Sadar (Mabbi O.P.), District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Darbhanga Sadar (Mabbi (OP) P.S. Case no. 26 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 379, 427 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant was sitting at his door, several accused persons including the petitioner came there and started to assault. Co-accused Kabir Paswan inflicted knife blow on the abdomen and back of the informant resulting into severe injury. When his father came there to rescue him, he was also assaulted by Bimal Paswan by giving him dagger blow resulting into his head fracture and Gauri Devi, bhabhi of the informant also received neck injury to whom petitioner has also assaulted her with iron rod.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71704 of 2021(3) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. From the injury report of Gauri Report, it appears that she has received simple injury caused by hard and blunt substance. He has got no criminal antecedent.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Darbhanga Sadar P.S. Case no. 26 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Darbhanga subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U