← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66579/2024dismissed

Sumit Kumar @ Karu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-10Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66579 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2022 Thana- KHUDAGANJ District- Nalanda ====================================================== Sumit Kumar @ Karu Kumar Son of Anuj Kumar Village - Kochra, P.S. - Khudaganj, Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ramashray Prasad NA Village- Kochra, Ps- Khudaganj, Dist- Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Awnish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 427, 506, 354 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have caught the minor daughter of the informant and tried to take her away and on seeing the informant's wife he fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that charge has been framed against the petitioner. He further submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66579 of 2024(4) dt.10-01-2025 2/2 petitioner is languishing in custody since 08.08.2024. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected in connection with Khudaganj P.S. Case No. 174 of 2022.

7. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of deposition of the informant.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T