← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59554/2025bail granted

Md. Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59554 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2024 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Rahman S/o Late Md. Timul R/o Village- Amona, Ward No. 1, P.S.- Jogbani, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 07.08.2024 at about 10:00 o'clock; the informant who is S.I along with his team was on patrolling duty and during course of patrolling he got information by S.H.O that this petitioner has kept codeine rich cough syrup in his tenanted shop. Upon such information a raid was conducted in the shop of petitioner where CENCOD-T cough (containing Triprolidine Hydrochloride and Codeine Phosphate) 07 bottles each

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59554 of 2025(2) dt.04-09-2025 2/3 containing 100 ml syrup and WISCODIN cough syrup (containing Triprolidine Hydrochloride and Codeine Phosphate) 2 bottles each containing 100 ml syrup was recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. The shop in question does not belong to this petitioner, no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way connected with the aforesaid recovery. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the facts of the case and also the backdrop of the case, clean antecedent and other circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions cum the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59554 of 2025(2) dt.04-09-2025 3/3 Special Judge NDPS Act, Araria in connection with Jogbani P. S. Case No. 171 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) aditya/- U T