← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36615/2017bail granted

Ajay Roy @ Ajay Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-21Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36615 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -146 Year- 2016 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Ajay Roy @ Ajay Rai Son of Shiv Shankar Roy, R/o Village- Mahua Phulwariya, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bela Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2016 in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 146 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on the basis of self confession before the police. No incriminating articles have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor Test Identification Parade was conducted for his identification. Similarly situated co-accused Bijay Kumar has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 4228 of 2017.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36615 of 2017 (3) dt.21-09-2017 named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Smita Raj, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 146 of 2016, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T