Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59829 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2023 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Golu Kumar S/O Radheyshyam Prasad @ Radheshyam Ray Resident of Village- Ghoshwari, P.S- Bakhatiyarpur, Dist-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Usha Kumari Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 436 of 2023 dated 09.10.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 364, 379, 341. 342. 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 09.10.2023 at around 8.00 A.M., his son was stopped by one Sadavriksh Raj while he was on his way to work, thereafter Golu Kumar (petitioner) and the co-accused Gulshan assaulted Monu with an iron rod and the co-accused, Sadavriksh assaulted Monu with butt of the pistol, on account of which, he became
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59829 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/3 unconscious, thereafter the accused persons fired on the people who had gathered and took Monu away on a motorcycle but the police was informed and on chase the accused persons fled away leaving Monu in an unconscious state near Jagdamba temple, thereafter Monu was taken to health center, where he disclosed that the co-accused, Sadavriksh had stolen his valuable and had also threatened and demanded ransom.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature which is mentioned in the impugned order dated 25.07.2025. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 11.04.2025. The co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 03.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 72997 of 2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59829 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 3/3
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Barh, Patna in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 436 of 2023, with a condition:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T