← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60006/2025allowed

Abhinandan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-22Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60006 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2024 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== Abhinandan Kumar Yadav son of Bachachelal Yadav Resident of VillagePathra, South, Ward No. 09, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhim Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 355 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022(Amended).

3. As per prosecution case, 24.6 litre illicit liquor was recovered from the motorcycle in question and co-accused Vikash Kumar was apprehended on the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has been transpired in the present case during the course of the investigation as owner of the motorcycle in question. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60006 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 2/3 further submits that petitioner has given his motorcycle to co-accused Vikash Kumar and he has misused the said motorcycle. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Supaul, Court No.1 in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 355 of 2024,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60006 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) vashudha/- U T