Neeraj Kumar @ Soni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.253 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2017 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Neeraj Kumar @ Soni, S/O Late Bilaiti Singh R/O- Sikari Chak, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhukar Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case initially registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the submits that after investigation charge-sheet was submitted under Sections 395 and 412 of the I.P.C.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 20.12.2017, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and has antecedent of one case. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant alleges that four unknown criminals after duping, took his truck loaded with iron angles.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.253 of 2022(3) dt.17-05-2022 2/2 F.I.R. was against unknown and the name of this petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused Ajit Kumar. It is further submitted that petitioner, despite in custody, was not put on T.I.P., nor any incriminating article was recovered from his possession to connect him even remotely with the offence.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and was not put on T. I. Parade, nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Didarganj P. S. Case No.105 of 2017, subject to condition that one of the bailors shall be the cousin brother of the petitioner namely, Chandan Kumar.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T