Praveen Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34536 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2016 Thana -NAYA RAM NAGAR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Praveen Kumar, son of Dhirendra Prasad Gupta @ Sah, R/o VillageHasanganj, P.S.- Naya Ram Nagar(Satiyasarai O.P.), District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Naya Ram Nagar P.S.Case No. 156 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation as per FIR is that in the night informant heard some sound in the room and saw the petitioner fleeing away and saw two other accused persons standing on earth and thereafter he saw that articles of his house have been theft. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against him and he has falsely been implicated in this case having clean antecedent and nothing has been recovered from his possession and he is in custody for three months. Heard learned APP also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34536 of 2017 (2) dt.28-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Munger, in connection with Naya Ram Nagar P.S.Case No. 156 of 2016, G.R.No. 1910 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U