Shri Saryu Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22327 of 2013 ===========================================================
1. Shri Saryu Singh Son Of Late Rajnarayan Singh Resident Of At. Vishnupur (Nayatola), P.O. Mahnar Road (R.S.), P.S.- Mahnar, Distt.- Vaishali, Bihar, Pin Code- 844507 .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry Of Coal, Govt. Of India, Shastri Nagar, New Delhi
2. The Northern Coalfield Ltd. Through The Chairman And Managing Director, P.S. And P.O. Singrauli, Dist. Singrauli
3. The Central Coalfield Ltd. Through The Chairman And Managing Director, P.S. And P.O. Ranchi, Dist. Ranchi, Ranchi, Jharkhand
4. The Coal India Ltd. Through The Chairman, Coal Bhawan, 10, Netaji Subhas Road, Kolkata (W.B.) .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. V.M.K.Sinha Mrs Kanak Verma, CGC =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-05-2016 Learned counsel appearing for the Coalfields categorically informs the Court that in terms of Annexure- R/3 the amount has already been credited into the account of the petitioner on 15.4.2016.
Counsel for the petitioner does not have inputs and there are practical reasons why he cannot receive inputs on the regularity, which is required in matter of instruction to a counsel. There is no reason to disbelieve the statement made at the bar on behalf of the Coal Company.
Patna High Court CWJC No.22327 of 2013 dt.11-05-2016 2/2 In view of the above, the Court disposes of the writ application with full liberty to the petitioner that if he finds any discrepancy or he still feels that he can claim something more from the erstwhile company, he always has remedy in law. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 11.5.2016 Transmission Date