Mithlesh Kumar Gupta v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40013 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1664 Year- 2000 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Mithlesh Kumar Gupta S/o Sri Ramchander Sao, resident of VillageSaistabad, P.S. Kako, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Surendra Kumar Gupta, Son of Late Harilal Shah, resident of VillageBahpura, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Complaint Case No.1664(C ) of 2000 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

The case is under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner is husband.

At the very outset, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife with all dignity and all the cares.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40013 of 2017 (2) dt.23-08-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, the learned court below is directed to issue notice to both the parties as well as informant of the case and if both the parties are ready to restart their conjugal life, the petitioner shall be released on provisional bail on in connection with Complaint Case No.1664(C) of 2000 of District- Patna to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Patna for a period of six months and the learned court below shall also watch their conduct by calling them in the first week of each month to see their conduct for the period of six months and if he is satisfied with the conduct of the petitioner, he shall confirm the bail bond of the petitioner, otherwise he is free to pass any other order or orders, as he deems fit and proper. It is also made clear that if the wife of the petitioner is not ready to live with the petitioner without any valid reason, then also the court below may release the petitioner on bail to his own satisfaction.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T