Ramesh Shukla v. Shri Umesh Shukla And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1735 of 2018 ====================================================== Ramesh Shukla Son of Late Chandeshwar Shukla, resident of Mohalla- Bhitri Begumpur Newati Tola, Patna City, Police Station- Khajekalan, Patna City, P.O.- Jhauganj, Patna City, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Shri Umesh Shukla 2.

Shri Brajesh Shukla Both sons of Late Chandeshwar Shukla Both Residents of Mohalla- Bhitri Begumpur Newati Tola, P.S.- Chowk Patna City, P.O.- Jhauganj Patna City, District- Patna.

3.

Smt. Usha Devi Pandey, wife of Shri Arjun Pandey, resident of VillageChapra, Police Station- Benipur, District- Chapra. 4.

Smt. Manju Devi, wife of Vikash Tiwari, resident of MohallaParshurampur, Police Station- Daudpur, District- Patna. 5.

Anju Kumari, daughter of Late Chandeshwar Shukla, resident of MohallaBhitri Begumpur Newati Tola, Police Station- Chowk Patna City, Post Office- Jhauganj, Patna City, District- Patna. 6.

Shri Rajendra Kumar, wife of Late Ram Lakhan Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Bhitri Begumpur Patna City, Police Station- Chowk Patna City, Post Office- Begumpur, District- Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2024 Present learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. On 25.04.2024, the following order was passed:- "Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not been able to obtain the correct address of respondent nos. 1 to 6 and seeks further time for the said purpose.

2. By way of last opportunity, further time of eight weeks is granted to the

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1735 of 2018(9) dt.08-07-2024 2/2 learned counsel for the petitioner to take steps for fresh service of notice upon respondent nos. 1 to 6 on their present and correct address, failing which the petition will be dismissed.

3. List this matter on 05.07.2024."

3. Office has reported that no steps have been taken for fresh service of notice upon respondent nos. 1 to 6.

4. Hence, for non-compliance of order dated 25.04.2024, the present petition stands dismissed.

5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not been able to make contact with the petitioner and therefore, steps could not be taken for fresh service of notice and seeks liberty to move appropriate application in accordance with law for revival of the petition. It is made clear that liberty is always available in accordance with law.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U