Indian Institute Of Health Education And Research v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.5891 of 2014 (2) dt.11-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5891 of 2014 ====================================================== Indian Institute Of Health Education And Research, Health Institute Road ( Near Central Jail), Beur, Patna- 800002, Recognized By The Government Of Bihar, Rehabilitation Council Of India, IAP, And ISPO ( Affiliated To The Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar) Through Its Managing Director, Akash Sulabh, Son Of Anil Sulabh R/O Mahalaxmi Bhawan, Near State Bank Of India, Police Station- Kankerbagh, Patna- 800020 .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. Through Its ChairmanCum- Managing Director, Patna, Bihar.
2. The Chairman- Cum- Managing Director, Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited Patna, Bihar.
3. The South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited Through Its Director, Patna, Bihar.
4. The Director, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Patna, Bihar.
5. The General Manager, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Patna, Bihar.
6. The Executive Engineer, Divisional Electrical Supply Office, New Capital, Patna.
7. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Sub- Divisional Electrical Supply, Nutan Capital, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Respondent/s :
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-02-2016 After some argument, Sri Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of Sri Anand Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the respondent / Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited, makes a prayer for disposal of the writ petition, so that, the petitioner may avail statutory remedy.
The prayer is allowed.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5891 of 2014 (2) dt.11-02-2016 The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty as indicated above.
It goes without saying that the period consumed by the petitioner in pursuing the present writ petition i.e. since 21.3.2014 till date, shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter. (Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U