Dhuri Murmu @ Sangita Murmu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71700 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2021 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR DistrictPurnia ====================================================== Dhuri Murmu @ Sangita Murmu Wife of Dharam Lal Marandi Resident of Devi Nagar, Simodi Rahika Ward No.07, P.S.- K. Nagar, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md Fazle Karim, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail of petitioner Dhuri Murmu @ Sangita Murmu who is apprehending her arrest in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 386 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per F.I.R., total 20 liters country made liquor was recovered from the sack of co-accused Talmaya Hemram and 21.5 liters country made liquor was recovered from the sack left by the woman succeeded to flee away. The apprehended co-accused disclosed the name of petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71700 of 2021(2) dt.14-06-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the coaccused has taken the name of the petitioner due to enmity and she has falsely been implicated in this case, she has no criminal antecedent and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts that the petitioner is a female and no recovery has been taken place from her possession, she has no criminal antecedent, as such I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Excise), Purnea in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 386 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) ved/- U T