Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34783/2017dismissed

Sachita Nand Yadav @ Sachidanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34783 of 2017 (2) dt.03-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34783 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -478 Year- 2016 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. SACHITA NAND YADAV @ SACHIDANAND YADAV S/o Late Indra Deo Yadav Resident of Village - Rewati, P.S. - Rewati, District - Ballia (U.P.).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarendra Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mithilesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Buxar Town P.S. Case No. 478 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 420 and 379 of Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 23 ATM Cards of different banks and he was identified in CCTV footage while withdrawing the money of sister of informant. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has now remained in judicial custody for about five months and charges have already been framed.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, considering the fact and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, at this stage, I

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34783 of 2017 (2) dt.03-08-2017 am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, his application for regular bail is, accordingly, rejected.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of six months and even by conducting it on day to day basis and if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the court below itself. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T