Kamrul @ Md Kamrul Hoda @ Md. Kamrul v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61824 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2025 Thana- POTHIYA District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Kamrul @ Md Kamrul Hoda @ Md. Kamrul S/O Late Ejabuddin Resident of Village- Jagirgachh, Gourkhal, P.S.- Pothia, Dist.- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pothia P.S. Case No. 73 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 303(2), 76, 351 (3), 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S, 2023 corresponding to section 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 354B, 506 , 504 and 34 of the IPC.
3. As per prosecution case, petitioner and other armed with weapon abused the informant and other. It is further alleged that petitioner and other are said to have assaulted informant's brother Farukh by means of iron saria due to which he fell down and it is further alleged that after falling on earth victim Farukh was assaulted 4-5 times as a result of which his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61824 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 head sustained injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further alleged that wife of co-accused Enamul has lodged Pothia P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 against the family member of the informant who tried to dispossess the petitioner and others on their purchased land and in retaliation of the said case, present case has been lodged where petitioner and other have falsely been implicated. Though, there is allegation that victim Farukh sustained 4-5 times head injury but the injury as mentioned in the impugned order only shows right shoulder pain, abrasion on mid parietal region of size 4"x1/2"x1/4' and also the injury of victim is simple in nature cause by hard and blunt substance.
The allegation made in the FIR is totally inconsistent with the injury report. Apart from that, petitioner bears no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused, Md. Muslim, has already been granted anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No.59250 of 2025 and the case of present petitioner stands more or less on similar footing.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61824 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner which is supported by injury report, though, the injury is simple in nature
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M-II, Kishanganj in connection with Pothia P.S. Case No. 73 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) vashudha/- U T