← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2610/2023allowed

Mr. Gopaljee v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-09Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2610 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13356 of 2022 ====================================================== Mr. Gopaljee S/o Mr. Hareram Singh R/o-Bhirkhi Uttarwadi, Ward No.-21, thana-Madhepura, Dist.-Madhepura, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, New Secretariat, Panta, Bihar.

2.

Bhupendra Narayan Mandal Univesity, Madhepura through the Vice Chancellor 3.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Patna, Bihar. 4.

The Principal Secetary, Governor's Secretariat, Patna, Bihar. 5.

The Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department, Patna, Bihar. 6.

The Director, Education Department, Patna, Bihar. 7.

The Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura. 8.

The District Magistrate, Madhepura.

9.

The Principal, Parwati Science College, Madhepura. 10.

Mr. Kameshwar Prasad Yadav S/o Late Gulat Yadav Resident of Birkhi, Dakshin, Ward No. 23, Thana- Madhepura, Dist- Madhepura. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy No. I(SC-13) Mr. Bijay Bhushan Pd., AC to SC-13 For the Vigilance :

Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-01-2026 The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 13356 of 2022, which has stood dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 08.05.2023.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has

Patna High Court MJC No.2610 of 2023(2) dt.09-01-2026 2/2 submitted that since the counsel for the petitioner was engaged in another Court, he could not appear when the case was called out for hearing, hence, the aforesaid writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, thus a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file.

3.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also taking into account the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 13356 of 2022 to its original file.

4.

The present petition stands allowed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U