Md. Mukti Mansoori v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60312 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2024 Thana- PARIHAR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Md. Mukti Mansoori S/o Bhigu Mansoori R/o Village - Chakmahila, P.S -Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No.288/2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of 36 liters Gaurav Nepali country made wine from two motorcycles in question bearing Registration Nos. BR01DG2743 and BR30AG1475.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has been surfaced in this case during course of investigation as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60312 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 2/3 the owner of the motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR30AG1475. He orally submits that the petitioner has given his motorcycle to someone and he has misused the said motorcycle due to which petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner bears one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. The petitioner was not found at the place of occurrence. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor. The petitioner is not in any way connected with the alleged occurrence. Seizure list has not been prepared as per law. In the light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, no case is made out against the petitioner under the provision of Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60312 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 3/3 Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I, Sitamarhi in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No.288/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- U T