← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61661/2025bail rejected

Bipin Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-01Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61661 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2025 Thana- NARDIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Bipin Yadav S/O Ajay Prasad @ Ajay Yadav Resident Of VillageMahanandpur, P.S- Deep Nagar, District- Nalanda at Biharsharif. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Mines Department Patna Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP For the Mines :

Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate Ms. Kalpana, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel for the Mines department.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, petitioner is owner of the seized truck which was loaded with 606 cft. illegally mined sand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61661 of 2025(5) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 this case merely because he happens to be owner of the seized truck. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is registered owner of the truck which was seized loaded with illegally mined sand.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T