← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72050/2021bail granted

Ruby Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-02Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72050 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2021 Thana- KHARIK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== RUBY KUMARI W/o Dinesh Yadav Resident of Village - Usmanpur, P.S.- Kharik, Distt.- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 307 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a woman having clean antecedent and the informant alleges that Pappu Yadav met and asked the informant to come to the basa of Dinesh Yadav as he was calling him and when the informant reached the basa, Dinesh Yadav fired upon him causing injury on his thigh due to which he fell down, thereafter it is alleged that this petitioner was repeatedly giving orders to kill him.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72050 of 2021(2) dt.02-08-2022 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as she is wife of Dinesh Yadav, it is further submitted that allegation of firing is on Dinesh Yadav. It is submitted that when the occurrence took place, it is not alleged that it was on the orders of the petitioner and subsequently when the informant fell on the ground, then he alleges that the petitioner was giving order to kill him.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kharik P.S. Case No. 120 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T