Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59658 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2025 Thana- MANER District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Vishal Kumar S/o Lalan Rai @ Lalan Chaudhary R/o Village- Serandha, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur 2.

Deepak Kumar @ Putul S/o Late Niranjan Paswan R/o Village- Serandha, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 267 of 2025 dated 14.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 310(2) and 311 of the B.N.S. and Section 27of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 4-5 unknown miscreants riding on three motorcycles are alleged to have tried to snatch money from the informant and when the informant objected the same, they fired on the informant due to which he sustained bullet injury on his hand.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. The name

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59658 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 of the petitioners has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Vinay Kumar. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent whereas the petitioner no. 2 has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 18.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners abovenamed, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Danapur in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 267 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T