Sudhanshu Patel v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60062 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2025 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Sudhanshu Patel son of Satyendra Prasad Resident of Village- Mirbigha, Chakwae, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 336/2025 dated 24.06.2025 registered for the offence punishable u/s 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 111(4) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 66B and 66D of the I.T. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, police got secret information that some miscreants indulged in cyber crime are assembled near Baghi field who are cheating innocent people through mobile phone. Thereafter, police raided the said place then on seeing police 22-24 persons started fleeing away but

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60062 of 2025(2) dt.25-08-2025 2/3 nine persons were apprehended, who disclosed their names as, Sudhanshu Patel (petitioner), Vicky Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, Sudhir Kumar, Gautam Kumar, Arvind Pandit, Mantu Kumar, Suraj Kumar and Santosh Kumar. On search, one mobile phone was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. As per Annexure-2, the mobile phone which was recovered from the possession of the petitioner belongs to the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nawada in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 336/2025, with the conditions;-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60062 of 2025(2) dt.25-08-2025 3/3 (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date (except on the date of examination which is to be held on 29.08.2025), failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

(ii). If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in the future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T