Chandrawati Devi v. The State Bank Of India Through Its Chief General Manager Pension Wing And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1131 of 2016 =========================================================== Chandrawati Devi, Wife of late Mahata Prasad, Resident of Village Jigna Jagarnath P.O. Mirganj, P.S. Mirganj, District Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Bank of India through Its Chief General Manager (Pension Wing) Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan Patna.
2. The Chief General Manager(Pension wing), State Bank of India, Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
3. The Assistant General Manager, Centralised Pension Processing Centre, Administrative office, Building , 4th Floor, J.C. Road, Patna-800001
4. The Branch Manager State Bank of India(Code No. 0085) Gopalganj Branch, Gopalganj, PinCode-841428
5. The Manager, State of Bank of India, Narania, Mirganj, Gopalganj.
6. The Union of India the Senior Divisional Finance Manager Sealdah, Eastern Railway, West Bengal.
7. The Senior Divisional Finance Manager, Eastern Railway, Sealdah, West Bengal.
.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Ram Kishore Singh, Advocate For Res. Nos.1 to 5 :
Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For Res. Nos.6 & 7 :
Mr. Bijoy Kumar Sinha, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-09-2016 Counsel for the State Bank of India informs the Court that pension is being paid to the petitioner and that is not an issue. Counsel for the petitioner however, informs the Court that it is the arrear or non-grant of pension for the period when the husband of the petitioner superannuated on 31.03.2012 till his death on 05.09.2013.
Patna High Court CWJC No.1131 of 2016 dt.20-09-2016 2 / 2 The Branch Manager of the State Bank of India, Narania, Mirganj, Gopalganj will verify the position and inform the petitioner as to the status with regard to such claim so that if necessary, petitioner can take necessary follow-up action with the railways authorities. Writ is disposed of in terms of the above.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) S.Kumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 21.09.2016 Transmission Date