Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48276/2017bail granted

Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48276 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -215 Year- 2017 Thana -MINAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Anil Kumar, Son of Ram Pravesh Sahni, Resident of Village- Panapur Laheri Tola, P.S.- Minapur (Panapur O.P.), District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Minapur P.S.Case No. 215/2017 registered for the offences punishable under sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a), 37(a), 33, 36, 48 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 35 litres of liquor from the cycle of the petitioner. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the seized article and he is in custody for more than three months having no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48276 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupess twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur in connection with Minapur P.S.Case No. 215/2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties in the jurisdiction of court concerned.

(ii) If involvement of the petitioner in such type of cases is found in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Surendra/- U