Mantu Kumar @ Mintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44246 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -898 Year- 2017 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Mantu Kumar @ Mintu Kumar, Son of Kedar Singh, Resident of Village- Baulia Road, Nuranganj, Sasaram, P.S.- Sasaram (T), DistrictRohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S.Case No.898 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 30 ltrs. of liquor.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has remained in custody for about 1 1⁄2 months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44246 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Court, Excise, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S.Case no.898 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T