Pawan Sah @ Pawan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38677 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2017 Thana -SHEOHAR District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Pawan Sah @ Pawan Kumar, Son of Hoti Lal Sah, Resident of VillageHarkarwa, P.S.Piprahi, District-Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Anand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No.6 of 2017, registered for offences alleged under Sections 341, 342, 353, 379, 504, 506, 323, 333, 224 and 225/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he along with coaccused Bhikhari Sah and 25-30 unknown people intercepted the informant with the help of one Scorpio vehicle and snatched away the accused Nawal Kumar who was arrested by the informant with 250 gms of Ganja. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated, the allegations are against several

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38677 of 2017 (2) dt.19-08-2017 unknown persons and moreover the accused Nawal Kumar has already been arrested. He further submits that Scorpio vehicle which is said to be involved in the alleged occurrence does not belong to him.

Learned APP though opposed the prayer for bail, but accepts the factual position that so far as the present petitioner is concerned, he is one amongst the other accused and unknown persons named in the FIR.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Pawan Sah @ Pawan Kumar be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Sheohar in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No.6 of 2017, subject to the conditions U/S 437(3) Cr.P.C. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U T