Saket Kumar Singh @ Chhotu Kumar @ Suket Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1251 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -251 Year- 2013 Thana -TEGHRA District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Saket Kumar Singh @ Chhotu Kumar @ Suket Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar Singh Son of Sri Lalan Kumar Resident of Village Saidpur, Police Station Gopalpur in the district of Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.A.Khan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 251 of 2013 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Police got recorded confessional statement of the petitioner and co-accused showing the involvement in the present case. Except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner had been made accused in several cases as detailed in paragraph 3 of the petition in which he is on bail and due to that reason petitioner has been implicated in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1251 of 2016 (3) dt.19-02-2016 2/2 the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade though he is in custody since 23.6.2015.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 251 of 2013. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Vats/- U T