Birendra Kumar Gupta v. State Bank Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21189 of 2021 ====================================================== Birendra Kumar Gupta, Son of Late Bhagwan Prasad At and P.O. - Tetaria, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State Bank of India through the Chairman State Bank of India, State Bank Bhawan, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai.

2.

Regional Manager, State Bank of India, First Floor S.B.I. Bazar Branch, Motihari, District- East Champaran.

3.

Manager State Bank of India Bara Chakia Branch, Bara Chakia, DistrictEast Champaran. 4.

Manager State Bank of India, Madhuban Branch, Madhuban, District - East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Manu Tripurari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-03-2023 The petitioner, by way of this writ petition, has prayed as under :- (A) A writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/orders/directions commanding the respondent for the following :- (i) To direct the respondents to credit the money Rs.236950/- (Two Lakh Thirty Six Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty Rupees) in the account of the petitioner in the pension account No. 11778979566 of S.B.I. alongwith interest.

(ii) To any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner entitled for."

Since the dispute is purely of civil nature, the writ petition would not lie against the same.

Patna High Court CWJC No.21189 of 2021(5) dt.21-03-2023 2/2 As such, the writ petition stands dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Ashwini/- Item No.74 U